[MD] reifying carrots

Ian Glendinning ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Fri May 4 01:53:20 PDT 2012


No Ron, the absurdity is "precisely".

Meaning (as value) is what its all about.
We agree already.

So back to your other response ...
Definitions (many possible) are part of meaning, but usage is a bigger
part, and direct experience of value bigger still. Meaning does start
and end with "a precise definition".

Ian

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:04 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ron,
> the concept of
> "precisely what we mean"
> is utterly absurd.
> Ian
>
> Ian,
> Then believing in values is equally absurd.
>
> Right?
>
> The problem is that "meaning" is value Ian.
>
> Clarity in meaning, ie: clarity in values is what the aim is
> it is the virtue, the excellence, the good, the highest good
> of static patterns of value.
>
> If this is utterly absurd then what the fuck are we doing.
>
>
> ...
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list