[MD] reifying carrots

[MarshaV]

Hi Andre,

I am more interested in free, open-ended discussions.  I think your style is more appropriate to a discussion between you and dmb, but go ahead and continue to use me if you need too.  
 

Marsha 
 




On May 6, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> Thanks for your valuable attention.
> 
> Andre:
> Well, I appreciate the sentiments Marsha but detect sarcasm as well as irony in your post. I am not going to explain either of these terms nor how I arrived at them. I would much rather have had you respond to the contents of my post. But, as usual, you don't. You will do everything to evade MOQ issues such as your  'latest' bandwagon: reification...which is NOT MOQ stuff but you say you are 'more and more convinced that...'.
> 
> Can you at least appreciate how frustarting it is for fellow posters who ask you for your MOQ stance and get nothing but hollow, evasive emptiness answers which, unfortunately are readily exposed as SOM. Does this not concern you?
> 
> Anyway, its the same old story with you. I'll repeat: does it not concern you that you are still stuck in SOM excavations and SOM explanations? The former is fine but the latter is indicative of lack of understanding of Pirsig's MoQ. And I firmly believe that the biggest problem with your reasoning is that which you constantly maintain (though you do not explicitly repeat nor admid despite your buddhist interpretative quotes): DQ is none other than sq, the intellectual level =SOM, the MOQ = experience.
> 
> Do you actually comprehend the meaning of static patterns of quality?
> 
> I truly doubt it bur convince us all....please.
> 
> Peace.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html