[MD] Theories of Meaning and Motivation

[Andre Broersen]

Marsha to Andre:

SweetPea, I had years of changing diapers, and years of cleaning up 
fur-balls. You are easy to ignore.

Andre:
The presumptuousness of this response! Who do you think you are Marsha? 
Boy what an EGO!!

I have had plenty of that in my years thank you very much.

Marsha:
The 'Metaphysics of Quality' or 'MoQ' is a designator.

Andre:
Another evasor. You are so predictably false. I should have known. Sorry 
I asked. You are not a person to discuss things with, this is what I 
have learned. You are not even a person to discuss patterns wirh as you 
seem to have no understanding at all about what they stand for, what 
they point towards.

Every response of yours is ambiguous and when someone points this out to 
you, you slither away for another interpretation which you do not make 
clear and/or subsequently deny. When asked for clarification or given a 
proposed interpretation at trying to understand you, you slither away 
yet again.

And you are lamenting the description I give you (the eel in a bucket 
full of snot) and others(Lucy)?

I will make my experience in trying to discuss things with you very 
clear Marsha: I wish you were not here on this discuss. You do not 
belong here. You are a complete partypooper. You do not engage. You do 
not give a shit about anything but yourself as much as you deny being or 
having or constituting one such conception.

You, my dear, as far as I am concerned on this discuss, are a waste of 
space and time.

To summarize: sorry I responded to your post and asked questions in the 
first place.