[MD] The hard question.

[MarshaV]

Greetings,

"‘Static quality’ refers to anything that can be conceptualised and is a synonym for the conditioned in Buddhist philosophy. 49"

49 - The ‘conditioned’ is everything dependent (or caused) by something else. This terminology is examined in more detail in Chapter Five."
     (McWatts, MoQ Textbook) 


Marsha 





On May 19, 2012, at 2:49 AM, Dan Glover <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone
> 
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ian Glendinning
> <ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dan,
>> 
>> Pirsig reacting to a "definition" of value as vague, says as you quote
>> "there is nothing vague about value / value-judgement"
>> 
>> Doesn't change the fact that by definition it's vague, even though by
>> experience it's not.
>> 
>> ie is this not a point about definitions, rather than about value ?
> 
> Dan:
> 
> My point to Marsha had more to do with her rather unwieldy definition
> of interplay: an ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent,
> impermanent and conceptualized processing in the infinite field of
> Dynamic Quality. That is not the definition I find in the
> dictionary... interplay is the effect two or more things have on one
> another. Now... isn't that simple?
> 
> I mean, WTF do you do with that definition that Marsha offered?
> 
> Poor Marsha, Dan thought. And then she wonders is the discussion
> closed? What discussion? What am I supposed to discuss about that kind
> of definition?
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> http://www.danglover.com
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html