[MD] The hard question.

[Jan-Anders Andersson]

Hi Joe

The bigger the difference between Dynamic and Static Quality, the bigger is the mathematical Value of DQ/SQ, i e the urge to invoke to start a process, an event or a change.

Or if we put it like this: Marsha pattern/Dmb pattern, if they were coherent, of the same value, no dialogue would appear. 

Jan Anders


22 maj 2012 kl. 21.51 skrev Joseph Maurer:

> Hi Ant and All,
> 
> I am thinking Physics are mathematically definable.  Metaphysics are
> mathematically indefinable. SQ/DQ.  Does this distinction open any doors for
> a valuation of evolution as levels in existence?
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 5/19/12 6:40 AM, "Ant McWatt" <antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Consequently, Chalmers confuses the metaphysical obstacles of the connecting
>> principles between mind and matter with the scientific explanation of their
>> relationship.  Critically, the scientific explanations of consciousness (as
>> with theories concerning phenomena such as electricity or light) are concepts
>> by postulation and, as such, open to continual revision.  In consequence, it
>> would be implausible to assume that definitive answers to such phenomena will
>> ever be achieved; only the discovery of better (though still) provisional
>> theories about such phenomena is the best we can hope for. 
>> 
>> Best wishes,
>> 
>> Ant
>> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html