[MD] The hard question.

[MarshaV]

Hello dmb, 

On May 30, 2012, at 1:50 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha said to dmb:
> 
> The fundamental nature of static (patterned) value is Dynamic Quality, and it is Dynamic Quality that is primary and real.  Static quality, even intellectual static patterns of value, are secondary; they are useful fictions.  The idea is to experience static quality and Dynamic Quality simultaneously.  I don't know what the accusation of conflation represents.  I am merely stressing that the fundamental nature of static (patterned) quality is Dynamic Quality.
> 
> dmb says:
> When you say that static value is Dynamic Quality, as you just did twice, then you are conflating those two terms. (conflate |kənˈflāt| verb [ trans. ] combine (two or more texts, ideas, etc.) into one.) 
> 


Marsha:
I do not accept your paraphrasing what I said, and then criticize the paraphrasing.  Get a life!   And you do not get to misrepresent what I write such as comparing it with the 180/360 degree analogy and then tell me I'm confused.  Get a life!  


Marsha