[MD] What am I doing here?

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Fifth post of day (this sixth). Sorry, couldn't help it. Had 
accidentally trashed one message, so thought I hadn't reached the limit.

Tuukka



31.5.2012 22:15, Tuukka Virtaperko wrote:
> Craig,
> well, I guess I'm asking a lot if I'm asking you to read all these 
> chapters, but on the other hand, you read LILA, which is a lot longer:
>
> http://www.moq.fi/sets-of-quality/on-relativizability/
> http://www.moq.fi/sets-of-quality/the-subjective/
> http://www.moq.fi/sets-of-quality/the-normative/
> http://www.moq.fi/sets-of-quality/the-aesthetic/
> http://www.moq.fi/sets-of-quality/formal-soq/
>
> The password is "kekkuli". Overly formal expression omitted from the 
> relativizability chapter.
>
> Tuukka
>
>
>
> 31.5.2012 20:06, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:
>> [Tuukka]
>>> They will not tell me why
>>> they hold the number four as sacred, as in, that there have to be
>>> exactly four levels of static value, and a MOQ with eight or sixteen
>>> levels is not MOQ or at least not interesting in any way whatsoever.
>> Four isn't sacred, but four is what has been shown to have 
>> explanatory power.
>> Pirsig has indicated how each level has evolved from the previous&  
>> has given
>> examples.  ("Code of Art" hasn't caught on because it fails both 
>> these criteria.)
>> To argue for a number other than four, one must show the connection 
>> to the other levels
>> &  give convincing examples.
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>