[MD] expanded rationality

[MarshaV]

On May 31, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha previously:
> 
> Start a discussion on the wisdom to distinguish between DQ and sq if you'd like.
> 
> Now:
> There is nothing to say about DQ, the Ultimate Truth.  It is indeterminate.  Do you not understand 'indivisible, undefinable and unknowable'?
> 
> Andre:
> I really do not know what bends, curves and detours you used to come up with this one Marsha. YOU are the one who suggested it in the first place.
> And, since you are so adamant about having nothing to say about DQ (which I share) and since you maintain that DQ is nothing other than sq and sq nothing other than DQ,(which I do not share) ,in other words, you are conflating the two, then why say anything in the first place? There is nothing further to say then is there, apart from manifesting you ego perhaps, because it is nothing but Marsha, Marha, Marsha.
> 
> And, rather than throwing another one-and-a-half-liner at me, why do you not address the objections I make to your perspective? I mean, the only response I get from you is a throw-away word or one-liner or other questions.
> 


Andre,

Besides you combining and misrepresenting my different responses from different posts which address different issues and badly paraphrasing my statements, our perspectives are different, our interests are different, our styles are different, our experiences are different, our understandings are different, our points-of-view are different, you whine too much, you are rude and you haven't properly explained your objections.  Also, I have no desire to change your mind. If it wasn't for you responding to my posts, I wouldn't pay much attention to you at all.  Your comments concerning the MoQ I find quite dull and static.  


Marsha