[MD] Economics

[MarshaV]

dmb and Andre,  


On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> The point dmb and Pirsig are making is the moral goodness of intellectual patterns dominating social and biological patterns. In other words it is good for social and biological patterns to be subordinate to intellectual patterns. Currently some intellectual patterns are subordinated to serve  social (financial) interests. This seems to be an accepted moral code (which you defend)in the same way what held the Victorian pattern together.

Here is another point RMP has presented:   

"While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served."
    (LILA, Chapter 32)
 
 
Marsha:
How it that that morality will be served???  It seems Andre's presentation of RMP's point does not necessarily match with what he writes in Chapter 32.   I am glad you cleared up your point.   I don't always find things as obviously black or white as you do.  


Marsha 
 
 
 
___