[MD] kill all intellectual patterns

[118]

Hi Horse,
Please explain to me how I am not discussing Pirsig's MoQ.  If you can point out where I stray from Pirsig's MoQ I am more than happy to oblige.  It seems to me that I am being picked on precisely because I explain, using Pirsig's MoQ to show how dmb is resorting to outlandish interpretations.  I am more than willing to discuss this with you Horse since you claim that I am not.

The last thing that Pirsig would want is for MoQ to paint Quality into rigidly dogmatic statements as dmb does.  He is high jacking MoQ into a Religion.

However, since this is a discussion of Pirsig's MoQ I am more than happy to learn from you where I have strayed.  If you are a moderator, then moderate.

Best regards,


Mark

On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Horse <horse at darkstar.uk.net> wrote:

> Mark
> 
> You may not have noticed but moq_discuss exists to discuss Pirsig's MoQ.
> Not Marks MoQ - but Pirsig's.
> 
> DMB understands this and this is, in general, what he discusses.
> 
> If you don't want to discuss Pirsig's MoQ then it's not DMB who needs to go away, but you.
> 
> This applies to everyone on this list and I'm getting really bored with the bullshit offered by certain members who seem to feel that any old waffle that they feel passes as MoQ discussion is acceptable.
> It isn't and unless this changes I will be removing those that won't play nicely.
> 
> Horse
> 
> 
> On 21/11/2012 23:29, 118 wrote:
>> Hi Commander dmb,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Well, I am sorry you did not understand what I wrote, but I am not
>> surprised.
> <SNIP>
> 
> -- 
> 
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
> — Frank Zappa
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html