[MD] words/time
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Sun Nov 25 20:24:10 PST 2012
Yes, I bought it sight unseen. I try to support anyone who makes an attempt at bringing a quality awareness to our overly objectified world. Quality is a work in progress, and I do my part to spread the message. I give ZAMM to my children's generation if I think it is appropriate. Don't know if they read it, but at least it is on their shelf.
Cheers,
Mark
On Nov 25, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Jan Anders Andersson <jananderses at telia.com> wrote:
> Still treating Quality as a replacement for God...
>
> I think you paid BEFORE you read MALC, didn't you? I have already met some who are ashamed of saying they liked it, just as the flush when they admit that they've secretly read "50 shades of grey" with doors locked. The reader value that causes sales are from trusty sources, when someone they trust recommend it.
> Marsha is the only one yet that have put a customer review on the iTunes page. Unsufficient confiding.
>
> Jan Anders
>
>
> 25 nov 2012 kl. 19:23 skrev 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>:
>
>> One thing I have been trying to convey, is that an object cannot HAVE
>> Quality. Quality is an interactive property which lies between objects.
>> An apple cannot HAVE Quality. Quality comes forth dynamically as we
>> compare apples or compare an apple to our previous experience with apples.
>> Quality is not a property of something, it is that which creates the
>> properties of that something. In order to see if your book brings about
>> Quality, you would have to talk to each reader. Sales are a good indicator
>> of reader value, though. Good luck with your book sales!
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list