[MD] The Art of Philosophy

[118]

Hi Joe, 
I find the analogy that DQ as creativity, and SQ as that created useful for presenting Quality.  I believe this falls within your presentation of Quality.

MoQ utilizes the tools of SOM because it must objectivize reality in order to discuss it.  I prefer to see MoQ as a pair of glasses.  Put them on and marvel at existence.  Quality is a positive view.  It does away with the battlefield of the objective and relative world.  It provides a world of ever becoming.

I appreciate your contributions.

Cheers,


Mark

On Oct 22, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Mark and All,
> 
> DQ indefinable. SQ definable. Strange bedfellows in reality.
> Indefinable/Definable equals 1?  IMHO  MOQ Metaphysics is not SOM
> mathematics S/O.
> 
> Joe  
> 
> 
> On 10/21/12 1:31 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> If we use DQ and SQ as variables, a system of homeostasis would
>> be described where the divisional form of this equation always equals 1.
>> Therefore, as DQ increases so must SQ.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html