[MD] 4 Mark - corrected.

[MarshaV]

Hi Joe,

Yes, there is morally categorizing the static (patterned) value into a four-level, evolutionary, hierarchical structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, but I thought, in a philosophical discussion, you often preferred  do, re, mi, fa, so, la, ti.


Marsha




On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Marsha and all,
> 
> In a philosophical discussion I do not like the word "hypothetical" applied
> to patterns in an environment where evolution has been suggested.  I like
> evolution as levels in existence.
> 
> Joe 
> 
> 
> On 9/12/12 9:19 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> I prefer to think of patterns as hypothetical (supposed but not necessarily
>> real or true.)   Once one accepts the MoQ's fundamental principal that the
>> world is nothing but Value, then 'expanded rationality' occurs when an
>> individual transforms the natural tendency to reify self and world into the
>> natural tendency to hold all static patterns of value to be hypothetical
>> (supposed but not necessarily real or true.) 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html