[MD] DQ/sq as WATER/ice
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Mon Apr 1 01:04:19 PDT 2013
Joe,
Directly experiencing DQ is directly realizing that there is nothing (nothing divisible, definable and knowable) persisting from moment to moment.
Marsha
On Mar 31, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Marsha V, and All,
>
> Fundamental nature needs some consideration in DQ/SQ metaphysics. If
> something is indefinable, there must be some congruent indefinable way to
> perceive it. I call that perception DQ. The conceivable conception is
> definable SQ.
>
> Jode
>
>
> On 3/29/13 12:38 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello Joe,
>>
>> I understand the fundamental nature of static quality (determinate) to be
>> Dynamic Quality (indeterminate). With this being a good analogy of that
>> relationship.
>>
>> "Water is distinct from ice, but in the ice cube it is present: not as a fly
>> might be trapped there, but _in the very ice_. And yet when the ice cube is
>> gone, the water remains. Although we see water as ice, we do so not because
>> it is there separately, to be seen from behind or apart from the cube."
>>
>> (Iain McGilchrist, 'The MASTER and his EMISSARY:
>> The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World', p.
>> 452).
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi MarshaV and All,
>>>
>>> I am confused!
>>>
>>> Do you view dynamic (indefinable) quality and static (definable) quality as
>>> having the same fundamental nature and only a difference in time or location
>>> for definition?
>>>
>>> I observe a value in the definition of perception (individual) as different
>>> from the definition of the conception of creation or evolution.
>>>
>>> IMHO
>>> Metaphysical DQ/SQ makes possible an evolution of levels in existence.
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/28/13 8:53 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For me, this is a good analogy for 'the fundamental nature of static quality
>>>> is Dynamic Quality.'
>>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list