[MD] DQ/sq as WATER/ice

Sun Apr 7 23:32:14 PDT 2013

Eddo

The Tecoma Bridge is a good picture. I gave the example of bouncing a basket ball to the floor in MALC.

By that experiment anyone can experience the feeling in their hands what a balanced wave can be like. I think it is better than waves of sound and colour because they are a little more abstract even if Pythagoras described it well.

Jan Anders

8 apr 2013 kl. 00.47 skrev Eddo Rats:

> Hi Adrie
> Net terug van muziek sessie. Maak je geen zorgen over mijn opslingeringen.
> 
> You're worries about my state of resonance rise gives me the idea that you
> seem to understand the direction i want to go to. I am  taking some more
> time to write a propper answer to your mail.
> 
> But for the time being i can tell you my findings of the mu state in the
> wave equation.
> 
> The resonance rise situation is dangerous because you are than suceptable
> to energy absorbtion. I don't yet know what kind of Energy but it causes
> your sensation levels to rise above sustainable levels.
> 
> Famous mechanical example of resonance rise too! high: tecoma bridge
> resonance rise! <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw>
> 
> Like this bridge can distort and break  a subconscious mind can
> distort(psychosis) and break(schizofrenia, dissosiation disorders)
> 
> 
> I believe i found the mu state in resonanance theory but have never been
> able to communicate it with anyone.
> 
> basic resonance rise equation:  e^iwt + e^-iwt = 2coswt
> 
> basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^(-iwt+pi/3) = coswt    (when cos
> wt = cos -wt)
> 
> 
> Have fun!
> 
> met vriendelijke groeten Eddo Rats
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **
> 
> 
> 2013/4/6 ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>
> 
>> Eddo, read learrn and chill-out a bit.
>> 
>> Mu state . Zen and the art.......someone quoting Roberts observations on
>> wiki.
>> 
>> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)*<
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)>
>> 
>> Good but no good article.
>> 
>> Under “unasking the question” there is a snippet from Zen where Robert
>> makes a numer of big mistakes.The entire thinkingline of Robert about
>> circuits and on/off caracteristics is wrong.
>> 
>> Computercircuits are never in a Mu-state.Only on first sight they seem to
>> be awaiting for zero power or power on as in on/off.What Robert is
>> depicting is a normal light circuit,a bulb, power on or of light on or off
>> , zero or not zero.
>> 
>> Integrated computer circuits have three different states, and zero or non
>> zero is not one of them.
>> 
>> High impendance (!)
>> 
>> Under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_impedance
>> 
>> You will be able to find digital electronics and analogue electronics.
>> 
>> Now it is very easy to find where Robert goes wrong ,In digital electronics
>> and computer circuits there are three different states, and they are not
>> Mu.
>> 
>> Robert tought that analogue electronics have the same properties of the
>> digital ones
>> 
>> Not being an electronic engineer,Robert will always miss the word he was
>> looking for
>> 
>> to make his entire point of view correct....”resonance rise” this was the
>> term he missed.
>> 
>> and to understand this
>> 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_(alternating-current_circuits)
>> 
>> Now my point for you Eddo
>> 
>> You are taking the term “resonance rise” out of the technical connotation
>> and understand it as “Opslingering”but this connotation makes me realise
>> where you want to point out with your wave equations, you are trying to
>> avoid your own mu states,
>> 
>> but fail to find the words, like Pirsig.Pirsig avoided his own Mu states!
>> 
>> The trick is in the imaginary slow-motion of indiana jones his whip, the
>> resonance rise in de wave is reflecting back to the hand that is on the end
>> of the whip,but the reflection moves up in amplitude depending on the
>> lenght of the whip and the induced amplitude in the first place.
>> 
>> This kind of reasearch is what you should be performing Eddo,instead of
>> pissing of Mr Buchanan.
>> 
>> en Blijf weg van “opslingering”!--resonance rise, en de stilte van de Mu.
>> 
>> Study these things before you will become Mu only, there is enough to
>> grasp.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Groet , Adrie
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/4/6 Eddo Rats <eddo4u at gmail.com>
>> 
>>> @dumb
>>> Typical you to pick this part being my soft spot as someone with a
>>> psychiatric hystory being honest about it. You are not a philosopher but
>> a
>>> moq philosophologist a politician and a narcistic priest that wants me
>> out
>>> of his church. Good luck with your church. You win! :D  probably dropped
>>> mathematics at highschool. This is that above the door
>>> Plato<http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Plato.html>
>>> inscribed
>>> "Let no one who is not a geometer enter"
>>> 
>>> My advice to you, read ZMM where pirsig goes to chicago again and again
>> and
>>> again and again. Look in   the mirror and think very hard. To me you're a
>>> lost case but never give up hope .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2013/4/5 david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>
>>> 
>>>> Eddo answered the million dollar question: What's the point?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ...Understanding this relationship became even more important during
>>>> psychotic episodes when i noticed that the amounts of sensation i had
>> to
>>>> deal with became so high that it had a distorting effect on the
>>> personality
>>>> i was (as a collection of concepts in my subconscious mind). This made
>> me
>>>> even work harder to be able to understand this relationship.   Now
>> after
>>>> twenty years i thought of a way to understand this, and this gives me
>>> tools
>>>> in my head to regulate myself when the sensations tend to become to
>> high.
>>>> So "the point" to me has very personal value...
>>>> P.S. Lets continue this discussion in the new thread i made "Quality
>>>> defined!" because we are hijacking this thread which was started with
>>>> another purpose by somebody else.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> dmb says:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry, but I'm not interested. Since Pirsig says (about a thousand
>> times)
>>>> that Quality can't be defined and since your interested in mostly
>>> yourself,
>>>> I don't think you're even talking about the MOQ. That's the point and
>>>> purpose of this forum and I'm not qualified to help you regulate your
>>>> sensations anyway.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> parser
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html