[MD] perceptions
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Mon Apr 8 12:06:21 PDT 2013
Hi MarshaV and All,
I sense no urgency in trying to come to grips with metaphysics. MOQ tweaks
the logic of SOM! I am not convinced that I have a proper conception of
logic. An open forum seems to be the most rewarding test for logic. I am
sorry I am so obscure. Good luck to you!
Joe
On 4/7/13 4:21 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> You're one your own. I am not sure what you are talking about.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Marsha V and All,
>>
>> SOM's theory of how we know things was through abstraction of the essence
>> from reality by the mind, giving it intentional existence in the mind using
>> a definable word form from a template of previous experience.
>>
>> MOQ, Pirsig suggests knowledge is the direct experience of reality DQ/SQ.
>> Dreams can follow that experiential reality, creating analogues mocking
>> reality?
>>
>> How can I know indefinable DQ? For me consciousness seems to be the only
>> reality that identifies a capability of an indefinable direct experience of
>> DQ. Dreams are interesting and creative mocking consciousness. They seem
>> so real. Nightmares!
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On 4/6/13 9:50 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> What do you mean by 'direct perception'? To the question "What is that?",
>>> the mind may adjust the visual data, but not apply language? Or do you have
>>> a
>>> different explanation?
>>
>>
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list