[MD] philosophology

[Jan Anders Andersson]

Here's the link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10200614071048741

J A

23 apr 2013 kl. 14.12 skrev Jan Anders Andersson:

> I think we'd better make them dance like this: Oh my freaking god..Wow wow wow..This is just amazing
> 
> Jan Anders
> 
> 
> 20 apr 2013 kl. 10.47 skrev ADRIE KINTZIGER:
> 
>> Robert is talking about parrots,2 parrots in a cage only repeat eachother
>> mistakes too often, we have to separate the parrots
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/4/20 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>> 
>>> 
>>> dmb,
>>> 
>>> Marsha had said:
>>> Can you read?  The subject line says 'philosophology'.  Read again what
>>> Annotation 133 says about philosophology and try to understand RMP's words
>>> in that context.  Do you understand the word 'context'?
>>> 
>>> dmb whines and tries to change the subject:
>>> ...
>>> ... snip.
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha now:
>>> Don't misrepresent my post; look again at the subject line.  RMP states in
>>> Annotation 133 from 'LILA's Child: "... I have read that the MOQ is the
>>> same as Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Hegel, James, Pierce, Nietzsche,
>>> Bergson, and many others even though these people are not held to be saying
>>> the same as each other. This kind of comparison is what I have meant by the
>>> term, "philosophology." It is done by people who are not seeking to
>>> understand what is written but only to classify it so that they don't have
>>> to see it as any thing new.  ..."  These are RMP's words.  Perhaps you
>>> should read them again.  RMP, in 'A brief summary of the Metaphysics of
>>> Quality', makes a similar statement:
>>> 
>>> "I also have a concern of my own. This is the concern that philosophers,
>>> instead of coming to grips with the philosophy at hand, sometimes dismiss
>>> it by saying, “Oh he is saying the same as someone else,” or “someone else
>>> has said it much better.” This is the latter half of the well known
>>> conservative argument that some new idea is (a) no good because it hasn't
>>> been heard it before or (b) it is no good because it has been heard before.
>>> If, as has been noted by R.C. Zaehner, once the Oxford University Professor
>>> of Eastern Religions and Ethics, I am saying the same thing as Aristotle;
>>> and if, as has been noted in the Harvard Educational Review, I am saying
>>> the same thing as William James; and if as has been noted now that I may be
>>> saying the same thing as Spinoza: then why has no one ever noticed that
>>> Aristotle and Spinoza and William James are all saying the same thing?"
>>> 
>>> And previously in the same document:
>>> 
>>> "The Metaphysics of Quality's central idea that the world is nothing but
>>> value is not part of any philosophic tradition that I know of. I have
>>> proposed it because it seems to me that when you look into it carefully it
>>> makes more sense than all the other things the world is supposed to be
>>> composed of."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> parser
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html