[MD] philosophology

[MarshaV]

dmb,

On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:36 AM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> And this confusion is exactly the mistake that leads know-nothing trolls like Marsha to adopt her vacuous nihilism and her sophomoric relativism. Follow her at your own peril.

It's interesting to me how you pick the RMP quotes that support your point-of-view and dismiss the RMP quotes that oppose your point-of-view, for instance:

"Historically music comes before the intellectual analysis of music and therefore is not dependent on it. Musicology, art and literary criticism, and philosophology are described in Lila as parasitic fields that sometimes try to control their host."
      (RMP, 'LILA's Child', Annotation 54

Or you seem to want to ignore the criticism of your philosophologizing as if you have attained a privileged position to reconstruct RMP's words to suit your will for power.  Your knowledge is not only limited to the depth of the ink on the page, it is limited to only self-supporting blotches of ink on the page.
 
 
Marsha