[MD] Independent reality?

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 5:04 AM, e-mail davidint
<davidint at blueyonder.co.uk>wrote:

> Hi Dan
>
> Maybe this will help:
>
> http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23797-after-finitude-an-essay-on-the-necessity-of-contingency/
>
>
>
Hi David

It might help if you tell me what maybe this will help. This has nothing to
do with the MOQ. It seems like a review of a book steeped in subject/object
thinking and weird jargon that no reasonable person can be expected to
fathom. For instance:

"Facticity is the point of departure for gaining access to this absolute:
Meillassoux shows that it is not the correlation, but rather the facticity
of the correlation, that constitutes the absolute. This entails changing
the function facticity has had for correlationism, insofar as it has to be
understood not as limiting our knowledge of the absolute, but instead as
granting us knowledge of it. In the end, facticity amounts to unveiling the
in-itself."

Dan comments:
Huh?

Dan

http://www.danglover.com