[MD] Intellectual Discussion and Dialectic - Finding agreement, Quality and beauty in the world.

[MarshaV]

dmb,

I acknowledge the discrepancy between concepts and reality, but as long as you misrepresent my statements, I have no respect for your babble.  

My explanation/definition of static patterns of value:

Static patterns of value are repetitive processes (multiple events), conditionally co-dependent, impermanent and ever-changing, that pragmatically tend to persist and change within a stable, predictable pattern.  Within the MoQ, these patterns are morally categorized into a four-level, evolutionary, hierarchical structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual. Static quality exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns.  Patterns have no independent, inherent existence.  

On Apr 29, 2013, at 3:20 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> dmb says:
> ... By the same token we can say static patterns are NOT ever-changing in the same way that cold is not hot or the same way that old is not young. The meaning of the terms is defined, in part, this logical opposition. The primary empirical reality, DQ, or reality itself is ever-changing.

Seems to me that Dynamic Quality is indivisible, without boundaries, unpatterned; what's going to change?  

"Change is probably the first concept emerging from this Dynamic experience..."
       (RMP, 'LILA's Child', Annotation 57)
 
 
 
Marsha