[MD] self

[X]

Only if  you're a rationalist. An empiricist can trace
Concepts to their agreement with experience. Ala Hume.

MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
>X-man,
>
>In such a way a unicorn exists too.  
>
>
>Marsha
>
>
>On Feb 3, 2013, at 3:09 AM, X <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The tetralemma can be addressed in this way
>> We ask if the concept has meaning if it has value.
>> If it has value we can say it exists.
>> 
>> 
>> MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:21 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>>> 
>>> But, X-man and dmb,
>>> 
>>> the definition in the previous post (below) represents a static interpretation, Ultimately:
>>> 
>>> One cannot say that the self exists. 
>>> One cannot say that the self does not exist. 
>>> One cannot say that self both exists and does not exist. 
>>> One cannot say that the self neither exists nor does not exist.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------- 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:56 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Greetings X-man and dmb,
>>> 
>>> Here's my definition of the self:  the “self” is a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.   
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org/md/archives.html