[MD] Sympathy for the Devil

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:31 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Dan Glover <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dan:
>> From what I gather, the perspective of the Dynamic 'World of Buddhas'
>> would be to say nothing at all as there is no intellectual distinction
>> to be made. Am I wrong in saying that?
>>
>
> Wow!  Absolutely agree!  Being accused of 'being', or posing as, a mystic, good or bad, just makes me roll with laughter.
>
> I would like to praise LILA's CHILD too.  It's a very valuable resource.  With the input from RMP and your hard and caring work it is essential reading.

Thank you, Marsha. Lila's Child is a labor of love.

> -  And I've been reading the discussion between you and David Harding.  It is fascinating.  Are DQ and sq the same?  Or does sq emerge from DQ?   But maybe that's my projecting onto the topic.

Well, of course if you've been reading our discussion you know I would
argue static quality emerges from Dynamic Quality. :)

Thanks again, Marsha.

Dan

http://www.danglover.com