[MD] Definitions.

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Dan and All,

Metaphysics explores the table for MOQ, DQ/SQ.  Unfortunately a storyline
can not carry enough logical rigor to clarify indefinable metaphysical
principles.  The theory of knowledge changes from S/O abstraction to DQ/SQ.

Direct experience of indefinable DQ/SQ, not SOM based abstraction, is the
format for knowledge.  DQ makes arguments more precise.  DQ is observable
and indefinable.  

I explore the metaphysical clarification that defined S/O contemplation is
invalid in some experiences.  DQ/SQ stretches the faculty for knowledge to
an indefinable/definable experience of reality   This is different from the
experience of definable SQM.

DQ/SQ reality invalidates the SOM theory of knowledge of abstraction.  DQ,
indefinable, is a metaphysical principle.  I structure a theory of knowledge
to include the indefinable.  I experience the indefinable.  I can not define
DQ.  I experience indefinable DQ consciousness along with the definable
structure of self-consciousness SQ.

DQ/SQ changes the definition of knowledge.  I accept the indefinable in my
consciousness.  SOM rationality did not rigorously explore consciousness.

Joe 


  On 2/17/13 12:53 PM, "Dan Glover" <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:

> Robert Pirsig
> isn't talking about Lila or Phaedrus per se; he is developing a
> metaphysics and using the storyline to explicate it.