[MD] words/time

Joseph Maurer jhmau at comcast.net
Mon Jan 7 12:14:37 PST 2013




On 1/7/13 1:21 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> Greetings Joe,
> 
> I do not understand you response.  What do you want of me?
>  
>  
> Marsha
> 
> 
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi MarshaV,
>> 
>> Joe, what do you want of me?
>> 
>> WOW!  
>> 
>> Dynamic!
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> On 1/6/13 1:18 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Joe,
>>> 
>>> To remind you:
>>> 
>>> "To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of
>>> quality it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic
>>> Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is free."
>>>      (RMP, LILA, Chapter 12)
>>> 
>>> Joe, what do you want of me?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi MarshaV and All,
>>>> 
>>>> I am at a loss for words!  DQ/SQ metaphysics seems to abhor words.  The
>>>> individual experiences the indefinable.  There is no out front
>>>> individuality
>>>> in an individual, he/she acts with judgment like everyone else.
>>>> 
>>>> DQ/SQ is a proper metaphysics.  How alone am I wrestling with an
>>>> indefinable?  One of millions!
>>>> 
>>>> Let us keep the indefinable in a special metaphysics!  This becomes
>>>> translated into I am special and I control an army to prove it.  A bigger
>>>> army is no better proof!  Would that the army of two suffice!  She made me
>>>> eat the apple!
>>>> 
>>>> Joe 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/4/13 10:48 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> p.s.  Amazement is a noun.  How objective is that?
>>> 
>  
> ,
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list