[MD] What's wrong with "schmaltz"?

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi John,

IMHO A change in metaphysics will explain the change in our perception of
experience.  I examine an individual's experience in the indefinable  DQ/SQ
metaphysics.  I accept this experience to be real. I accept the concept of
indefinable levels through evolution, enabling a variety in individuality in
the present environment, to be the hallmark of individuality.

I accept the indefinable format DQ/SQ.

I perceive the format S/O to be inadequate.  SOM is flawed definability.

The individual, in discrete levels in existence follows an indefinable
freedom, freewill.  Indefinable DQ validates individuality. SOM metaphysics
is unlike indefinable DQ/SQ.  DQ is an indefinable element in metaphysical
principles!    

I avoid a principle for order found in a rigidly defined mathematics. It
ignores free will.  Preference for the metaphysical definition S/O to be
abandoned in favor of DQ/SQ enhances evolution DQ and has a solid foundation
in metaphysics, DQ/SQ.

Joe


On 1/12/13 8:01 AM, "T-REXX Techs, Inc." <trexxtechs at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> It seems to me that music and art of this period evokes
> memories of simpler times, when humble and sincere piety was not culturally
> unfashionable.  Why does contemporary culture regard such patterns of
> quality with a certain smug disdain?  I really want to know.