[MD] Is experience just DQ?

[Jan Anders Andersson]

Hi Joe

Consciousness is having a concept about yourself. Like a mind-mirror. One can also be conscious about being conscious, and conscious about being conscious about being conscious, but that is going too far because the last doesn't add much more functionality compared to the first levels.

"Pataphysics is related to Metaphysics as Metaphysics is related to Physics."
Boris Vian


Jan Anders


14 jan 2013 kl. 22:35 skrev Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net>:

> Hi David and All,
> 
> "Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me."  Youth!
> 
> Consciousness is not a stick or a stone, but, un, words, flash, etc. are
> perceived in consciousness and I die!  What is that all about?
> Consciousness!  Granary!  Time, Storage considerations!  That too?  DQ/SQ
> demands an element of consciousness for validity.  What is consciousness?
> *,@,&,@,#,&<>,",%,+,!,~,+,~!@#$%^&*()_+:"<><?
> 
> Joe 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/13/13 6:03 AM, "David Harding" <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> The MOQ is obviously a Metaphysics.  What is Metaphysics for? To me, it is an
>> intellectual construct which, depending on its quality, can help us to live
>> better lives.   It does this by providing a context for *every* thing.  With a
>> good metaphysics like the MOQ we can compare any two things and use it to help
>> us determine which is better.  Making quality decisions like this help us to
>> become better people.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html