[MD] Metaphysics: what it is good for?

[X Acto]

>
> In the thread titled "Is experience just DQ?" (on 1/13/13) David Harding wrote:
> The MOQ is obviously a Metaphysics.  What is Metaphysics for? To me, it is an intellectual construct which, depending on its quality, can help us to live better lives.  It does this by providing a context for *every* thing.  With a good metaphysics like the MOQ we can compare any two things and use it to help us determine which is better.  Making quality decisions like this help us to become better people.
>
>
> dmb says:
> How does the narrator of ZAMM put it? Metaphysics is fine if it improves everyday life, otherwise forget it.
> Yes, the Metaphysics of Quality is an intellectual construct (sq), a coherent set of concepts and definitions. And yet the MOQ is built around immediate experience itself (DQ), which is pre-conceptual and undefinable. Even further, this primary empirical reality (DQ) is given priority over the conceptual (sq).

Dan:
Exactly. This relates directly to the core of our (David H. and my)
disagreement. How is Dynamic Quality given priority over our
conceptual world? By seeing Dynamic Quality and experience as
synonymous. We use qualifiers like 'primary' and 'empirical' to modify
the term 'experience' but once this primacy of experience is
understood (in relation to the MOQ) it is no longer necessary do so.
Dynamic Quality is experience. All that which comes after is static
quality. 
 
Ron:
The source of the disagreement is that while Dave B. and Dave H. are placing emphasis
on the qualifier "immediate" in relation to the term experience as a clarification of just what
is meant by the term Dynamic, Dan is using the term "experience" in a more broad general way
as to imply the exclusion of the term "static" in association with "experience".
 
And that is quite a difference.
 
..