[MD] self

[Horse]

Hi All

Wouldn't it be better to define self, as distinct from other, from 
within different frameworks?
In a subject/object framework you have definitions based upon either a 
subjective or objective point of view and from within a MoQ framework 
you have static patterns emerging in response to Dynamic Quality.
Neither is 'correct' as they are dependent upon the overall framework 
currently employed. Trying to shoe-horn one set of patterns into the 
other framework results in confusion.
The beauty of the MoQ lies in the dispensing of subjects and objects, in 
favour of an emergent self as a response to Dynamic Quality. Reflection 
upon 'Self' becomes an Intellectual pattern. The intellectual pattern of 
self responds to Dynamic Quality which creates a new intellectual 
pattern - distinct from, but related to, the prior pattern.

Horse



On 29/01/2013 18:42, X wrote:
> Don't like your analogy
> Using my own
> Didn't think you'd mind.
>
> Guessin that if the self doesent exist
> One can hardly be expected to reflect
>   
> .
>
> MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>> Greetings X-man and dmb,
>>
>> Here's my definition of the self:  the “self” is a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html

-- 

"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa