[MD] Where does DQ end and SQ begin and SQ end and DQ begin?It's all bananas isn't it?

[Dan Glover]

We 'experience' Dynamic Quality all the time. The thing is, the term
experience is a static quality representation of that which cannot be
fully defined even though we define 'it' all the time.

"In a subject-object metaphysics, this experience is between a
preexisting object and subject, but in the MOQ, there is no
pre-existing subject or object. Experience and Dynamic Quality become
synonymous." [Robert Pirsig, Lila's Child]

So, within the context of the MOQ, to say we experience Dynamic
Quality is a bit of a misnomer. No?

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:59 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Greetings All,
>
> Just for the record, I am not confining the term 'process' to _words_.  Taste, feel, sight, smell and sound are all process too.  imho.  So I might suggest that an experience of Dynamic Quality might seem like a mental version of 'white noise'.   Nothing divisible, nothing definable and nothing knowable
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:41 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Perhaps experienced, but not yet processed.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, "David Morey" <davidint at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marsha
>>>
>>> If DQ is unique (patternless) it cannot be divided into anything else, it cannot be defined in relation
>>> to anything else, but we can surely know it via experience I would suggest. What do
>>> you think?


http://www.danglover.com