[MD] DQ/sq as WATER/ice

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Marsha V, and All,

Fundamental nature needs some consideration in DQ/SQ metaphysics.  If
something is indefinable, there must be some congruent indefinable way to
perceive it.  I call that perception  DQ.  The conceivable conception is
definable SQ.

Jode


On 3/29/13 12:38 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> Hello Joe,
> 
> I understand the fundamental nature of static quality (determinate) to be
> Dynamic Quality (indeterminate).  With this being a good analogy of that
> relationship.
> 
> "Water is distinct from ice, but in the ice cube it is present: not as a fly
> might be trapped there, but _in the very ice_.  And yet when the ice cube is
> gone, the water remains.  Although we see water as ice, we do so not because
> it is there separately, to be seen from behind or apart from the cube."
> 
>         (Iain McGilchrist, 'The MASTER and his EMISSARY:
>                The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World', p.
> 452). 
> 
> 
> Marsha 
>  
>  
> 
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi MarshaV and All,
>> 
>> I am confused!
>> 
>> Do you view dynamic (indefinable) quality and static (definable) quality as
>> having the same fundamental nature and only a difference in time or location
>> for definition? 
>> 
>> I observe a value in the definition of perception (individual) as different
>> from the definition of the conception of creation or evolution.
>> 
>> IMHO 
>> Metaphysical DQ/SQ makes possible an evolution of levels in existence.
>> 
>> Joe 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/28/13 8:53 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> For me, this is a good analogy for 'the fundamental nature of static quality
>>> is Dynamic Quality.'
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html