[MD] Putting SOM back into the MOQ by excluding SQ, let's not do that say some of us
Dan Glover
daneglover at gmail.com
Sun May 5 20:38:12 PDT 2013
Hello everyone
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:12 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com> wrote:
> rmp - Dan
>
> "Time is a
> primitive intellectual index of this change."
>
> “In the MOQ
> time is dependent on experience independently of matter"
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Adrie.
> By implication the first statement labels time as non subject non object,
> non conceptualisation-"primitive etc....
>
Hi Adrie
Have you read Ant's papers on time? I'd be interested in what you think.
http://robertpirsig.org/Evolution.htm
http://robertpirsig.org/MOQTime.htm
Adrie:
> So our history can remain as it is, only the philosophical and scientifical
> way we previously tought about it, is finetuned.
> there is no conflict with dynamic or static quality.
>
Dan:
Right. Rationality is expanded.
Thanks, Adrie!
Dan
http://www.danglover.com
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list