[MD] Putting SOM back into the MOQ by excluding SQ, let's not do that say some of us

Dan Glover daneglover at gmail.com
Sun May 5 20:38:12 PDT 2013


Hello everyone

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:12 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com> wrote:

> rmp - Dan
>
> "Time is a
> primitive intellectual index of this change."
>
> “In the MOQ
> time is dependent on experience independently of matter"
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Adrie.
> By implication  the first statement labels time as non subject non object,
> non conceptualisation-"primitive etc....
>

Hi Adrie
Have you read Ant's papers on time? I'd be interested in what you think.

http://robertpirsig.org/Evolution.htm

http://robertpirsig.org/MOQTime.htm


Adrie:

> So our history can remain as it is, only the philosophical and scientifical
> way we previously tought about it, is finetuned.
> there is no conflict with dynamic or static quality.
>

Dan:
Right. Rationality is expanded.

Thanks, Adrie!

Dan

http://www.danglover.com



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list