[MD] laws of thought

[Jan Anders Andersson]

Dear Marsha

You know from my book that to separate the good from the bad is to check if it saves time or not. If a pattern (of logic contradiction) saves time, it feeds and grow, otherwise it eats and diminish.

How about an unburned piece of clay formed as a teapot, will it save more time than a burned teapot piece of pattern?

JAn Anders


8 maj 2013 x kl. 10.31 skrev MarshaV:

> 
> Greetings,
> 
>> dmb:
>> Again, the question is only whether or not logical contradictions are bad or not.
> 
> Are the?  Hmmm.  It depends on context. 
> 
> ”The problem lies in the fact that Western intellectual history has been intent upon creating an understanding that is founded upon universal laws, and, in order to create such universal laws, we have attempted to eliminate all objects of thought to which such laws do not universal apply.  This, however, is irrational since there obviously are dynamic and holistic objects of thought to which the laws of thought do not universally apply."
> 
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=download&collection_id=4e77b46be4a50e73&writer=rl&return_to=Law+of+thought
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html