[MD] theories of truth
Jan-Anders Andersson
jananderses at telia.com
Mon May 20 07:05:24 PDT 2013
So whenevef you hit something hard with your toe, like a physical pattern, it's just hypothetical. Yes or No?
Truth might be painful.
All the best
JanAndrs
20 maj 2013 kl. 15:31 MarshaV wrote <valkyr at att.net>:
>
>
> If again you are addressing static (relative) truths, than yes indeed, it is better by far. But personally, I prefer to stick with RMP's terminology "static patterns of value" without the need to assign the term 'truth'. And I prefer to think of all static patterns of value as hypothetical.
>
>
>
>
> On May 20, 2013, at 9:07 AM, David Harding wrote:
>
>> To those folks it does. However I think that the MOQ's theory of truth is better. Don't you?
>>
>> On 20/05/2013, at 10:32 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>>
>>> We're talking static (relative) truths, right?
>>>
>>> 'High quality intellectual patterns'? Sounds good, but considering that by consensus (in the noted survey of intellectuals for example) correspondence theories seem to win, who's to make such a 'general' determination? Obviously, those who answered the survey question thought they were choosing the highest quality theory. Does that qualify as truth?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 20, 2013, at 7:45 AM, David Harding wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marsha,
>>>>
>>>> All theories of truth are intellectual. With truth being high quality intellectual patterns - they are true depending on how good they are. I think the best 'theory of truth' is the one offered by the MOQ - 'High quality intellectual patterns'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would some theories of truth be excluded from the intellectual static pattern of value labeled 'truth'?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marsha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 19, 2013, at 5:06 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most believed theories
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to a survey of professional philosophers and others on their philosophical views which was carried out in November 2009 (taken by 3226 respondents, including 1803 philosophy faculty members and/or PhDs and 829 philosophy graduate students) 44.9% of respondents accept or lean towards correspondence theories, 20.7% accept or lean towards deflationary theories and 13.8% epistemic theories.[42].
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list