[MD] Static Patterns Rock!

[David Morey]

DMB: But, alas, Marsha thinks DQ can't be the ever-changing flux of experience but DQ is nothing, so there is nothing to change - and, sadly, David Morey wants to change definition of DQ so it can be nailed down is a physics lab

DM: No rather I want an MOQ that helps to explain how physics is possible,  which obviously it is,  rather than make it sound like something we have thought up and is not grounded in a real experience of real patterns and real regularities, so we can judge how well our concepts match real experience,  undifferentiated DQ cannot be judged against concepts,  if undifferentiated DQ means no subject-object divide that is correct,  if it means primary experience has no content,  that is deluded I believe. Obviously this content is value laden content,  but surely it is content nonetheless, although no container,  it is just experience,  but patterned and variable,  overwhelmingly so,  and luckily very much filtered and reduced by our bodily senses so that we can make some sense of key aspects.