[MD] Static Patterns Rock!

[David Morey]

Hi DMB

Let me think,  largely from you and your selective quoting. So you are saying DQ has no patterns but is full of content,  but you cannot offer any description of that content…  sounds pretty confused to me,  perhaps you can help,  how do you know DQ is full of content? What is your evidence? I agree DQ is full of content,  I call it shapes,  colours,  patterns, etc.

By the way why can you only argue with my position by bending or exaggerating it? I do try to stick to what you write,  incoherent though it seems to me.

David M

david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>David Morey said to DMB: 
>
>... undifferentiated DQ cannot be judged against concepts,  if undifferentiated DQ means no subject-object divide that is correct,  if it means primary experience has no content,  that is deluded I believe. 
>
>
>
>dmb says:
>
>Primary experience has no content? Right, just like your "white noise" and your "ink blots".
>
>Again, it is YOUR misconception of DQ that creates the problem you're complaining about.
>
>You are removing the content of DQ and then complaining about the lack of content. That's not a problem with the MOQ but rather a problem with your understanding of the MOQ's key terms. And you can only retain this misconception by reading the evidence very, very badly. Your misconception seems to be based on nothing at all. 
>
>Where did you get the idea that DQ has no content or that "Dynamic Quality" means anything like "white noise"? That's not what James, Pirsig, Northrop, Bricklin, or anyone else has said about it. It's simply the wrong idea. Get rid of that and the whole problem instantly evaporates.
>
>
>
>
>
> 		 	   		  
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org/md/archives.html