[MD] Fwd: Re: Static Patterns Rock!

[Andre Broersen]

David M to Horse:
I am OK to drop pre-conceptual and replace it with pre-cultural SQ, and 
cultural-SQ, so that all SQ is conceptual but the distinction I have 
pointed out is seen as valid, could make the split biological SQ versus 
intellectual SQ. So I would see biological SQ as having evolved 
naturally, is more given, is less open to change, and intellectual SQ as 
more open and can change and develop culturally. Would you agree?

Andre:
No David. You're way off the mark.
'It wasn't any particular esthtician who produced this reaction in him. 
It was all of them. It wasn't any particular point of view that outraged 
him so much as the idea that Quality should be subordinated to /any/ 
point of view. The intellectual process was forcing Quality into its 
servitude, prostituting it. I think that was the source of his 
anger'(ZMM, p 207).

I get the distinct feeling that you fully realize what you are doing 
David, and you are doing it for ego-tripping, self-centered reasons, 
whatever these are.

Bloody hell: pre-cultural sq?...cultural sq Biological sq and 
pre-biological sq?? Inorganic sq and pre-inorganic sq??? DQ and pre-DQ????