[MD] Sociability Re-examined

John Carl ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 17:24:32 PDT 2014


Arlo,

I didn't get the idea from Bo.  He certainly does not agree with my query.
I did discuss it with him, maybe that's where he got the terms which made
you think I derived my idea from him.

But I didn't.

John


On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR <ajb102 at psu.edu>
wrote:

> [Horse to JC]
> No it's not - religion is a social pattern, not the Social level. Don't be
> silly!
>
> [Arlo]
> Of course its a very sophomoric idea. And here's the context behind it. Bo
> (who apparently still monitors MD) sent me an email that read, in part,
> "About "religion" as the social definition is something John has from me,
> but he omitted my reservations and qualifications."
>
> So now you know where this is originating. Whatever other deductions you
> make from this are up to you.
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
"finite players
play within boundaries.
Infinite players
play *with* boundaries."


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list