[MD] "RMP: Ignoramous or fraud?

[John Carl]

I agree Adrie,

Except I never said I didn't read Lila.  I'd read it twice by the time I
joined here, and pieces and bits sporadically since.   Sometimes I
mis-remember, but the gist is with me always.

Take care,

John



On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Adrie Kintziger <parser666 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dan used a word not so long ago, that nested itself in my mind.
> I liked the word, the term.I knew it would come in very handy later on.
> The word was beachcombing.Nobody went along with the story he wanted to
> tell,on that moment.
> If properly placed in a philosophical context  it would be a good and
> usefull tool.
>
> maybe we should be beachcombing Whitehead's work,and comparisons like
> offered on the moq page-(Sneddon),as David is pointing towards.
> I did only read it diagonally and very fast, but it shows promising
> toughts.
> I do not really oppose to Whitehead because John persists on him,just like
> he did with Royce in a somewhat compulsive manner.
> Maybe we should start beachcombing along this Sneddon thesis.....,but
> this is not the colusseum and we are no gladiators.We should gain
> something out of it.Improvement. betterness.Progress=>=>=>
>
> Dan is very correct if he demands a man needs to know his case,there
> is no case whatsoever without the correct details.It shows itself in
> remarks
> about reading Northrop/Whitehead in the bowels of the troopship,presenting
> half-quote's
> or admitting like tuuk did, that he did not really read Lila.
>
> The doll is still to be found whilst beachcombing guys,and nobody here
> needs to be a professor.
> But simply stating that the moq is invalid (without reading the work),
> is drooling all over the place.
>
>
> I really wished that Dan would be still talking about his beachcombing,
> and found some dialogue.I like irl grounded story's.They tend to be very
> philosphical.
>
> Adrie
>
>
>
> 2016-11-01 18:51 GMT+01:00 John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>:
>
> > And admittedly, I was trying to get a rise out of y'all.  So at least
> that
> > worked.  Thanks dmb for the link to the comparison by Sneddon.  Very
> > helpful.
> >
> > jc
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > My apologies.  I'm getting old I guess, I thought it was Whitehead but
> > > you're right Andre of course Andre.
> > >
> > >
> > > sheesh, how embarrasing.  I guess we all know who the REAL ignoramus
> is.
> > >
> > > mea culpa
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Andre Broersen <
> andrebroersen at gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> John:
> > >> So "ignoramous" non-perjorativel then, but the fact is, he DID at
> least
> > >> read some AN Whitehead.  Quotes him
> > >> from reading his book on history of philosophy, in the bowels of the
> > >> troopship.
> > >>
> > >> dmb:
> > >> And speaking of fraudulent ignoramuses, nobody around here will be
> > >> surprised if John has tried to slander Pirsig or if has dishonestly
> > tried
> > >> to smuggle in a theistic view. Again. It's like a hobby, I guess.
> Trolls
> > >> will be trolls.
> > >>
> > >> Andre:
> > >> And not only that but John bases the slander on false claims he
> invents
> > >> himself. Phaedrus did not read A.N. Whitehead at all in the bowels of
> > the
> > >> troopship! He was reading F.S.C. Northrop ‘ The Meeting of East and
> > West”.
> > >> A simple reference to page 117 of ZMM will suffice (Corgi edition).
> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > >> Archives:
> > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "finite players
> > > play within boundaries.
> > > Infinite players
> > > play *with* boundaries."
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "finite players
> > play within boundaries.
> > Infinite players
> > play *with* boundaries."
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
"finite players
play within boundaries.
Infinite players
play *with* boundaries."