[MD] Annotations to LC

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Ron,

I get it, you're using the Socratic method when you claim rhetoric is 
dialectic. But I'm also using the Socratic method when I convince you 
rhetoric and dialectic are different things. So what about the Socratic 
method?

Do you mean this part of the article?

"Frede[6] points out that Vlastos' conclusion in step #4 above makes 
nonsense of the aporetic nature of the early dialogues. Having shown 
that a proposed thesis is false is insufficient to conclude that some 
other competing thesis must be true."

Do you want an aporetic MOQ? Aporia means:

1. An insoluble contradiction in a text's meaning
2. A figure in which the speaker professes to be at a loss what course 
to pursue, where to begin to end, what to say, etc.

So you're basically saying you want an inconsistent MOQ? You know, one 
in which it's okay to argue that germs killing doctors and scientists 
are a good thing?

Regards,

Tuk



On 17-Nov-16 1:14, X Acto wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Tuukka Virtaperko<mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net>  wrote:
>>
>> Ron,
>>
>> see this:http://www.differencebetween.net/language/the-difference-between-rhetoric-and-dialectic/
> Tuukka,
> See Socratic method:
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
>
> -Ron
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus