[MF] the way forward for MoQ discussion lists

[Dario Savella]

Sorry... I thought that the

(K)eep (I)t (S)imple (S)tupid

method was universally accepted and recognised. Yet another gross 
mistake on my part.

Never mind

Cheers
Dario

Wim Nusselder wrote:

>Dear Dario,
>
>No, that most definitely is NOT just you... I'm still subscribed, but read
>very little. Mainly when my name is used. (I make Outlook Express sort such
>e-mails out for me.)
>Please explain the KISS method.
>
>With friendly greetings,
>
>Wim
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Dario Savella" <dario_moq at growingman.com>
>To: <moq_focus at moqtalk.org>
>Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 4:04 PM
>Subject: Re: [MF] Testing Testing
>
>
>Hi Sam,
>
>your idea is quite structured and exaustive.
>I wonder thought how much of the debate in each list will be about the
>topics and how about if each posting is within the boundaries of the
>specific list.
>I imagine people giving a metaphysical answer to a pilitical question
>raised in the religious list.
>
>I am for the KISS method.
>
>Dario
>
>BTW, I unsuscribed from MD because I couldn't cope with the amount of
>stuff to read. Maybe it's just me.
>
>_______________________________________________
>moq_focus mailing list
>moq_focus at moqtalk.org
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
>
>
>
>  
>