[MF] the way forward for MoQ discussion lists

[Sam Norton]

he he he :o)

quite happy to drop the 'new age' - believe it or not, I wasn't _trying_ to be 
pejorative!!

hey Lorenz - good to have you on board, I look forward to more discussions.

BTW, just to clarify, if there were separate 'general 
mysticism/mythology/religion' and 'moq from Xn perspective' threads - I'd be 
subscribed to both.....

Sam
http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ian glendinning" <psybertron at gmail.com>
To: <moq_focus at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [MF] the way forward for MoQ discussion lists


> Hi Sam,
>
> Any chance of Campbell / Wilber / Mysticism also not being branded
> "New Age" at birth :-)
>
> Ian
>
> On 11/7/05, Sam Norton <elizaphanian at kohath.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This seems about right:
>>
>> an MD list as at present;
>> MF replaced by several 'themed' streams - and we now have the flexibility for
>> people to choose which and how much to subscribe to, and how it might be
>> received.
>>
>> By the way, thinking about the different 'streams', I'd quite like to have a
>> distinct 'MoQ from a Christian perspective' stream - distinct from a 'MoQ and
>> mythology/religion' stream - but perhaps that's selfish (although presumably
>> anyone can start up a thread appealing to their own interests, and then it'll 
>> be
>> a question of 'survival of the fittest' - appropriately evolutionary for the
>> MoQ?) I just think there is an awful lot of material that could be fruitfully
>> considered, and separating it out from the general mysticism/Campbell/New Age
>> stuff would stop it from being drowned at birth.
>>
>> Any thoughts? (Maggie?)
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "ian glendinning" <psybertron at gmail.com>
>> To: <moq_focus at moqtalk.org>
>> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 10:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: [MF] the way forward for MoQ discussion lists
>>
>>
>> > Sam and others have recently suggested more modern on-line forum
>> > styles. I'm all for these, and use many different ones. For
>> > conversational on-line forums these are great, but ...
>> >
>> > I see two issues,
>> > One - Horse has clearly decided to pursue mail-server style
>> > technology. His choice as he's volunteering to administer it.
>> > Two - we have this split need between slower, considered subject
>> > debate forum (like the current MF) and a more immediate conversational
>> > medium - like some of us currently use MD
>> >
>> > Are we gravitating towards
>> >
>> > An MF forum (multiple per subject stream as necessary) with a slower
>> > moderated mail-server style, and
>> > A new MD conversational discussion forum, with few holds barred except
>> > rules of relevance and honest morality. (also used as a news update
>> > vehicle for the MF domain and the permanet web-site contents.)
>> >
>> > A blend of both worlds ?
>> >
>> > Ian
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > moq_focus mailing list
>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
>> > Archives:
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
>> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> moq_focus mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> moq_focus mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/
>
>