[MF] reality: interactions or quality?

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Mon Feb 20 07:27:17 PST 2006


At 09:23 AM 2/20/2006, Ian wrote:
>I agree he can't spell everything out. He leaves us to draw our own
>conclusions. In fact I think most of us who've had time to think about
>"quality" can see "faith" at the root of any metaphysics, and love in
>his quality interaction metaphors. I think choosing the word "quality"
>was his stroke of genius. A deliberately ineffable "quality" we could
>all already identify with - not too scientific, not too religious -
>and enough rope to hang ourselves with of course.

Ian,

What are you saying?  Can't disgust be an extremely low quality, 
dynamic experience?  And what happened to 'experience' rather than faith?

Marsha






More information about the Moq_Focus mailing list