[MD] Where does ligic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[Ian Glendinning]

Andre, Ron,

I think you both got (and expressed) my point.
I despair that Bo ever will ... as ever he resorts to pejorative
personal attacks with "idiocy" aimed at you when his understanding
breaks down. Sad really.

Ian

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ron to Bodvar:
> therefore 2+2=4 is based on abstract symbols that have no
> corresponding experience. It is an abstraction based on the concept of
> a whole entity.
>
> whether animals are capable of this sort of conceptualization is
> debatable since this is what Pirsig describes as defining the human
> intellectual level "the manipulation of abstract symbols with have no
> corresponding experience"
>
> Andre:
> You say it so much clearer Ron and it nicely ties in with Pirsig's
> definition of the intellectual level which I omitted to mention.
>
> Cheers
> Andre
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>