[MD] Metaphysics
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Thu Jan 14 02:01:24 PST 2010
Andre, All.
13 Jan.you wrote:
Steve to me I presume:
> > Since you equate the MOQ with reality, fitting all of reality into the
> > intellectual level is a problem for you. But accpording to the MOQ, the
> > MOQ is not reality. Quality is reality. The Metaphysics of Quality is
> > words about reality (Quality) rather than reality (Quality) itself.
Steve's unwillingness to understand is monumental. "...fitting all of
reality into the intellectual level" My foot! Intellect is a MOQ level thus
by no twist of (norma)l logic can the MOQ be an intellectual pattern.
The MOQ is the Quality Reality in the same sense that Newton's
Theory is the Gravity Reality. "Where was gravity before Newton ...
etc. Regarding "words" see Andre's below
Andre:
> Now, I fail to recognise (having read your reactions to Bodvar's
> post) that language, as a social PoV is somehow different from Reality
> (recognised by Pirsig as DQ/SQ). Isn't language part of the totality
> of DQ/SQ? How the heck is Dynamic change possible at all the levels
> (the lower two regarding our understanding of them) if, as some of you
> appear to imply, language is something different from this DQ/SQ?
Spot on, I'm delighted that other see the MOQ context. The reason
that Steve lapses back to words/reality as the great metaphysical
divide is that he hasn't moved out of SOM where language is
subjective and thus some illusory shadow of objective reality "out
there". He has not comprehended that the S/O distinction is rejected
as absolute (relegated the role as MOQ's static intellectual level) By
Steve's perpetuates SOM in a thin Q-disguise, now Quality the
objective reality with the MOQ some subjective shadow. .
> It seems to me that SOM prevails when language is considered only as
> an expression ABOUT reality ( i.e a subjective expression about an
> objective ...other reality ...out there) and does not ( as I
> understand Pirsig) function as an active participant PoV IN the DQ/SQ
> process.
Right you are (wiping a little tear of recognition)
Bodvar
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list