[MD] Metaphysics

Steven Peterson peterson.steve at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 04:49:08 PST 2010


Hi Bo,

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:01 AM,  <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
> Andre, All.
>
> 13 Jan.you wrote:
>
> Steve to me I presume:
>> > Since you equate the MOQ with reality, fitting all of reality into the
>> > intellectual level is a problem for you. But accpording to the MOQ, the
>> > MOQ is not reality. Quality is reality. The Metaphysics of Quality is
>> > words about reality (Quality) rather than reality (Quality) itself.


Bo:
> Steve's unwillingness to understand is monumental. "...fitting all of
> reality into the intellectual level" My foot! Intellect is a  MOQ  level thus
> by no twist of (norma)l logic can the MOQ be an intellectual pattern.

Steve:
Come on, Bo. "Unwillingness to understand"? our argument is with
Pirsig, not with me. You know full well that Pirsig has specifically
said on numerous occasions that the MOQ is an intellectual pattern.

For example, in LC he writes:
"79.Since in the MOQ all divisions of Quality are static it follows
that high and low are subdivisions of static quality. “Static” and
“Dynamic” are also subdivisions of static quality, since the MOQ is
itself a static intellectual pattern of Quality."

Regards,
Steve



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list