[MD] The MOQ Conundrum

[markhsmit]

On Jan 23, 2010, at 10:44:29 AM, skutvik at online.no wrote:
Bo before:
> > Why not just:say that static experience arises from dynamic experience?
> > That's the MOQ message. 

Platt: 
> But that begs the question, "What does dynamic experience arise from?" 

Platt, seriously, do you think there are answers to questions like yours 
above, which is related to ones like "what is outside of space", "what 
was before time"? 
[Mark]
Perhaps there are answers to these questions, and we certainly will
not be able to get there if we say it is impossible.  I see Bo dismissing
logic, and then using logic to dismiss it.  Is there an apprehension
outside of SOM?  I think that is obvious.

Have you ever gotten up early in the morning on a bright white
morning in the mountains and been one of the first on a ski slope.
You get into a rhythm as you go down the slope, your legs going
back and forth like a pendulum.  And then: YOU DISAPPEAR.
You become one with the mountain, there is no distinction between
you and the ground, all is one.  Suddenly, POOF! you start to think
about it, analyze it, and Quality once again disappears into the
background.

The intellect can be used to access Quality, but it is not
Quality itself.  MoQ is a path.  It may be a useful path,
and it seems to me that some use it well, thanks Andre
and Platt for your attempt to provide a method for
getting to Quality in my previous posts on that subject.

The structure of MoQ has but one purpose, to provide a
way of experiencing Quality outside of the intellect.

IMHO, of course.