[MD] The MOQ Conundrum
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Sun Jan 24 08:06:52 PST 2010
Hey Mark,
On 23 Jan 2010 at 11:06, markhsmit wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2010, at 10:44:29 AM, skutvik at online.no wrote:
> Bo before:
> > > Why not just:say that static experience arises from dynamic experience?
> > > That's the MOQ message.
>
> Platt:
> > But that begs the question, "What does dynamic experience arise from?"
>
> Platt, seriously, do you think there are answers to questions like yours
> above, which is related to ones like "what is outside of space", "what
> was before time"?
> [Mark]
> Perhaps there are answers to these questions, and we certainly will
> not be able to get there if we say it is impossible. I see Bo dismissing
> logic, and then using logic to dismiss it. Is there an apprehension
> outside of SOM? I think that is obvious.
Apprehension outside of SOM? You betcha!
> Have you ever gotten up early in the morning on a bright white
> morning in the mountains and been one of the first on a ski slope.
> You get into a rhythm as you go down the slope, your legs going
> back and forth like a pendulum. And then: YOU DISAPPEAR.
> You become one with the mountain, there is no distinction between
> you and the ground, all is one. Suddenly, POOF! you start to think
> about it, analyze it, and Quality once again disappears into the
> background.
Excellent metaphor. Same thing happens when confronted by great art,
great beauty. You lose yourself and become one with all.
> The intellect can be used to access Quality, but it is not
> Quality itself. MoQ is a path. It may be a useful path,
> and it seems to me that some use it well, thanks Andre
> and Platt for your attempt to provide a method for
> getting to Quality in my previous posts on that subject.
>
> The structure of MoQ has but one purpose, to provide a
> way of experiencing Quality outside of the intellect.
>
> IMHO, of course.
Of course, your opinion is correct. I lost myself while reading ZAMM and
Lila and became one with Quality. The prattlings of the SOM scientist
obscure reality, as the following expresses:
When I heard the learn'd astronomer;
When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me;
When I was shown the charts and the diagrams, to add, divide, and
measure them;
When I, sitting, heard the astronomer, where he lectured with much
applause in the lecture-room,
How soon, unaccountable, I became tired and sick;
Till rising and gliding out, I wander'd off by myself,
In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,
Look'd up in perfect silence at the stars.
-- Walt Whitman
Regards,
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list