[MD] Intellect's Symposium
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 26 18:32:22 PST 2010
Hi John,
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:55 PM, John Carl wrote:
> John:
> I'm not a religious person either Marsha, but boy what you describe sure
> seems like what religious people seek, that annihilation of self, that
> feeling of non-cognitive control, the euphoria.
>
> It seem very similar to an experience people seek in church when they're
> "caught up in the spirit" babbling in an unknown tongue, fainting, or
> engaging in a charismatic service - a non-verbal, non-cognitive experience
> which, without words or concepts confirms in their being a reality they
> don't normally experience.
>
> I never sought it out, I'm too verbal. I like my own train of thought, I'm
> attached to cognition and I've often wondered why "solitary confinement" is
> considered a punishment. I'd think in prison it'd be nothing but relief to
> get away from everybody for a while.
Marsha:
I once made a ten-second delayed freefall. That was very exciting too, it expanded my experience of time, but I cannot imagine anyone translating my excitement into such a silly religious experience as cited above.. You're as ridiculous as Bo converting my unpatterned experience into unpatterned bliss. You say there are no such experiences as unpatterned experiences, I say there are. Convincing you is not my intention.
>
>> Marsha:
>> I'm not a religious person and have no idea what a religious experience
>> would be.
>>
>> For weeks it felt like something was going to happen, like my mind was
>> squinting, or something, and then it happened. It was visual. I was seeing
>> but their were no thoughts in my head, but I was aware. It was seeing, but
>> not seeing anything. It lasted about 5 minutes, no less, but I don't know
>> for sure. I was flabbergasted because it was so obvious. OMG, unpatterned
>> experience!!! Or, OMG I was totally aware without thinking. And then I
>> began not to believe my own experience, so I did on my own. Naturally, I
>> was excited. The next day I did it again of my own volition. I was
>> overjoyed, of course. It was wonderful. It was amazing. I tried it again
>> about a week later, and made it happen, but I haven't tried it since, which
>> is sad. Life interfered, or more probably I'm lazy and ungrateful. But it
>> was "real". Yet it's no big deal; it's what naturally happens. I guess.
>> Oh, I don't know; I don't know anything.
>>
>> I do not often enough sit in meditation, but do try to keep a mindfulness
>> throughout my day. I think there is a relationship, but I'm guessing. I
>> had a very formal meditation practice for a few years and was able to watch
>> my thoughts. I have no trouble saying that's watching patterns flicker
>> through mind, and that is why I go on about Quality (unpatterned experience
>> and patterned experience); both have been experienced.
>>
>
> John:
> Well, I guess I'm too metaphysically picky, like I said before. Because I
> see what you describe as "differently patterned" experience. "non-normal
> patterns of experience" rather than "UNpatterned". But I do understand
> better now what you mean by the term, and this helps my understanding.
> Thanks.
ok
>
>> Marsha:
>> Maybe you'll think I have just described indigestion. Maybe if I hadn't
>> had such experiences I'd think the same thing.
>>
> John:
> Nah, I've seen people in the throes of non-cognitive religious ecstasy at
> rock concerts and certain worship services, it's way different than
> indigestion. I believe you.
Marsha:
The question might be, what have you imagined for me?
Marsha
_______________________________________________________________________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list