[MD] What does Pirsig mean by metaphysics?

[Andre Broersen]

Bodvar to Andre:
But I said (meant at least) that the dualisms you mentioned had
dynamic/static connotation ... not S/O ... are we doomed to eternal
misunderstandings?

Andre:
Without wanting to be too unkind Bodvar, what you say very often does
not coincide with what you mean and vice versa. Whether the
misunderstandings occuring due to this will be eternal ...well that's
up to you ...realising that 'eternal' is a fucking long time!

Bodvar:
and here "Atman" sounds like a definition of subjectivity, while
"Brahman sounds like a definition of "dynamic" in other words one
from the SOM and one from the MOQ. Did I speak  about the "woolly"
Indian philosophy

Andre:
I take the Wkipedia with a grain of salt:
I liken Brahman/Atman to the Big Self and Small Self. Nothing much
subjective and /or objective about these. And, for your info there is
a difference between Hinduism and Buddhism. Phaedrus went to a Hindu
University.

Bodvar:
Did I speak  about the "woolly" Indian philosophy

Andre:
Nothing 'woolly' about Indian philosophy Bodvar...just because it
doesn't agree with your S/O aggregate :-)

I really think you are looking for S/O divisions...just like the
Plattonians looking for commies under the bed.

Andre