[MD] Intellect's Symposium

[John Carl]

>
> Hi John and Mary, this is an addendum to...but I had hoped you would
> have figured this out:
>
>
And upon what foolish assumption would such a hope be based, Andre?

Intellectual valuations or social ones?

At least for my part, I fail to see any supporting evidence.



> Bodvar sees the Gate (as a S/O aggregate) to be real and if you do not
> see this as real, not experience this as a real part of your
> experience and understanding then there is something very wrong with
> you...



Ok.  This is plainly understood by both Bodvar and me.  I am woefully
ignorant and he is teaching me.   I have tried to convince him at times that
I deserve promotion to the first grade, but he is not convinced.

Part of the problem being, of course, that I enjoy kindergarten more...
crayons and toys and stories, than self-exalted, self-formulated theories
about cosmologies beyond demonstrability.

I mean, to me, pragmatism is suPOSED to be fun.


you will never fully understand the MoQ. ...the gate being the
> 'M' .
>
>

Well I disagree.  You're "M" is too pointy at the top.  Like those conical
brassieres women wore in the 50's.  I'm an advocate of the "m"oQ.  Small
"m".  Not so grandiose and arrogant perhaps.  More humble.  More boob
shaped.

But of course, more accurate.

I don't know if EVERYTHING is relative.  I haven't gotten around to
tabulating, encapsulating and objectifying EVERYTHING quite yet.  But I am
quite sure intellectual patterns are all relative because Robert M. Pirsig
gave me a vision with his "just enough mirrors" to see objectivity
objectively.

So there's that.

But tell Bo sorry about missing "the gate" or whatever that is ,

loyally yours,

John